Draft:Goldilocks Work

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Comment: There are three types of sources here: primary sources by the creators of this; wikipedia articles and things that don't mention the topic. None of these are allowed. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

The Goldilocks Work approach to the design of work uses the Goldilocks Principle analogy[1] arising from the fairytale “Goldilocks and The Three Bears”.[2] The concept of designing the physical and psychosocial elements of work to be ‘just right’ for both workers’ health and the sustainability of the organization was first described in 2018,[3] with further details published in 2019. [4]

History and Development[edit]

Goldilocks Work logo

The Goldilocks Work concept was created by Professors Leon Straker, Svend Erik Mathiassen and Andreas Holtermann with the aim of creating work which not only minimised the risk of harming workers, but also actually enhanced their health – whilst maintaining or enhancing productivity.[3] [4]

The Goldilocks Work approach draws on work design principles, including ergonomics, human factors, organisational psychology, work physiology, and occupational health promotion, which, together with the four key Goldilocks Work principles stated below, form the Goldilocks Work approach.

The four key principles of Goldilocks Work state that it:[edit]

  1. Aims to (re)design jobs to have a ‘just right’ combination of physical and psychosocial work elements, rather than aiming for zero exposures
  2. Aims to (re)design productive work to contribute to socially and economically sustainable production, rather than taking time away from production
  3. Aims to create work systems that lead workers into ‘just right’ behaviours, rather than relying mainly on individual motivation and resources
  4. Aims to have an explicitly positive impact on health, rather than mainly focussing on reducing risk and removing negative impacts

Goldilocks Work aims to design or re-design the physical and psychosocial elements of work to promote worker health, with the vision of contributing to global goals for individual, workplace, and societal sustainability.[5] It shares principles with other approaches to occupational health, including that it:

  • Uses a collaborative and participative approach
  • Considers the (existing) work situation and constraints
  • (Re)designs work by modifying tasks, reorganising task, or introducing new tasks
  • Focusses on physical and/or psychosocial elements of work
  • Considers individual worker health, including capacity
  • Matches work demands with worker capacity
  • Integrates into usual organisational work design
  • Aims to enhance productivity of organisations by reducing worker ill-health
  • Aims for an overall beneficial effect of interventions, while acknowledging that a trade-off between positive and negative effects may occur when simultaneously targeting different aspects of physical or psychosocial health

Adoption and Implementation[edit]

Researchers from Denmark, Australia, Sweden, Norway and Scotland have formed a collaboration and have trialled the Goldilocks Work approach in various industries including: childcare,[6] brewing ,[7] pharmaceuticals,[8] elder care and rail driving.[9] These early trials have reported that workers, worker representative organisations, supervisors and managers, company representative organisations and government authorities have readily embraced the approach.

Key terms[edit]

‘Just right’ combination – combining physical, mental or social elements of work within and across productive tasks in ways that lead to appropriate variation and promote health. For example, providing short periods of high aerobic intensity interspersed with recovery periods close to rest. Similarly providing periods of intense mental concentration interspersed with less mentally demanding periods, or periods with intense social interaction combined with periods being alone.

Physical – relates to the mechanical elements of work (such as strength demands, frequency and energy intensity of actions required) and the neuromuscular and metabolic health of workers (such as motor coordination, range of movement, muscle strength, bone strength, aerobic fitness).

Psychosocial – relates to the mental and social elements of work (such as mental demands, autonomy, and social support) and the cognitive and emotional health of workers (such as short-term memory function, resilience).

Health – a broad term defined by the WHO as a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.[10] Included in the physical and mental attributes is the notion of capacity; that is, what a person can do. Improving capacity is a way of improving a worker’s resources and chances for a higher quality of life, at work and outside of work.

Capacity – the extent of an individual’s capability to function, including physical and psychosocial abilities, i.e. what a person can do.[11] Changes in capacity can occur relatively quickly. For example, if periods of high-intensity physical work are introduced in an otherwise sedentary job, increased aerobic capacity may be observed within a few weeks. However, effects on capacity may also be evident only over the long term. For example, tasks requiring occasional overhead reaching may not change the measurable range of movement at the shoulder on the short term, but over decades of working life would help ensure the worker retains a large range of motion. Similarly, tasks requiring some simple mental maths or short-term memory may not change measurable cognitive capacity following a few months, but could, over decades of working life, help ensure that the worker builds and maintains mental capacity at and outside work.

Sustainability – is the ability of something or someone to continue activities over a period of time, including social, environmental, and economic aspects (often termed a triple bottom line for ‘people’, ‘planet’, ‘profit’).[12] While much community discussion has been focussed on the ‘planet’ aspect including climate change, Goldilocks Work considers the ‘people’ in an organisation and the organisation’s ‘profit’. Specifically, Goldilocks Work focusses on supporting the worker’s ability to perform the physical and psychosocial elements of productive work, which is an integrate part of worker health. Thus, Goldilocks Work helps the sustainability of the organisation by not taking workers away from productive work in the short term, and by having a positive impact on the capacity of workers to be productive in the long term. Goldilocks Work aligns with the UN Sustainable Development Goals, especially good health for all (goal #3) and decent work and sustainable economic growth (goal #8).[13]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Goldilocks principle", Wikipedia, 2023-06-09, retrieved 2023-12-03
  2. ^ "Goldilocks and the Three Bears", Wikipedia, 2023-11-20, retrieved 2023-12-03
  3. ^ a b Straker, Leon; Mathiassen, Svend Erik; Holtermann, Andreas (2017-06-29). "The 'Goldilocks Principle': designing physical activity at work to be 'just right' for promoting health". British Journal of Sports Medicine. 52 (13): 818–819. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097765. ISSN 0306-3674. PMC 6029635. PMID 28663212.
  4. ^ a b Holtermann, Andreas; Mathiassen, Svend Erik; Straker, Leon (2018-07-18). "Promoting health and physical capacity during productive work: the Goldilocks Principle". Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 45 (1): 90–97. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3754. ISSN 0355-3140. PMID 30021029. S2CID 51699260.
  5. ^ "THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development". sdgs.un.org. Retrieved 2023-12-03.
  6. ^ Lerche, Anders Fritz; Vilhelmsen, Maja; Schmidt, Kathrine Greby; Kildedal, Rasmus; Launbo, Natja; Munch, Pernille Kold; Lidegaard, Mark; Jacobsen, Sandra Schade; Rasmussen, Charlotte Lund; Mathiassen, Svend Erik; Straker, Leon; Holtermann, Andreas (2020-10-12). "Can Childcare Work Be Designed to Promote High Intensity Physical Activity for Improved Fitness and Health? A Proof of Concept Study of the Goldilocks Principle". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17 (20): 7419. doi:10.3390/ijerph17207419. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 7600739. PMID 33053791.
  7. ^ Lerche, Anders Fritz; Mathiassen, Svend Erik; Rasmussen, Charlotte Lund; Straker, Leon; Søgaard, Karen; Holtermann, Andreas (2021-04-28). "Development and Implementation of 'Just Right' Physical Behavior in Industrial Work Based on the Goldilocks Work Principle—A Feasibility Study". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18 (9): 4707. doi:10.3390/ijerph18094707. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 8125316. PMID 33925078.
  8. ^ Lerche, Anders Fritz; Mathiassen, Svend Erik; Rasmussen, Charlotte Lund; Straker, Leon; Søgaard, Karen; Holtermann, Andreas (2022-02-23). "Designing industrial work to be 'just right' to promote health - a study protocol for a goldilocks work intervention". BMC Public Health. 22 (1): 381. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-12643-w. ISSN 1471-2458. PMC 8867863. PMID 35197018.
  9. ^ Naweed, Anjum; Chapman, Janine; Vandelanotte, Corneel; Chappel, Stephanie E.; Holtermann, Andreas; Straker, Leon (November 2022). "'Just Right' job design: A conceptual framework for sustainable work in rail driving using the Goldilocks Work Paradigm". Applied Ergonomics. 105: 103806. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103806. ISSN 0003-6870. PMID 35772288. S2CID 250096327.
  10. ^ "Constitution of the World Health Organization". www.who.int. Retrieved 2023-12-03.
  11. ^ "ICF Beginner's Guide: Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health". www.who.int. Retrieved 2023-12-03.
  12. ^ "Triple bottom line", Wikipedia, 2023-11-25, retrieved 2023-12-03
  13. ^ "THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development". sdgs.un.org. Retrieved 2023-12-03.