Draft:Multiable
Submission declined on 14 March 2024 by Ldm1954 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 26 February 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 2 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 21 February 2024 by Jamiebuba (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Jamiebuba 3 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 21 February 2024 by DreamRimmer (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DreamRimmer 3 months ago.
| |
Comment: There needs to be more than just existence of a company for it to be considered as notable. For instance, donating software is not notable. As previously noted, I think there is no chance a page will be accepted. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Articles are based on independent sources, you have NONE here so no chance of being accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 08:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Multiable is a business software company with offices in Hong Kong.[1], Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Shanghai[2][3][4]. It also has office in Singapore and Malaysia[5][6]. It was established on 1989, and the headquartered is in Hong Kong[7]
Multiable is an ERP company serving over 6,000 customers[8] in Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong and China. The company sells a range of software solutions[9], including ERP, HCM, CRM, POS, e-Commerce and AI/RPA solutions that help businesses manage their core processes.
In 2019-2020, Multiable Company donated software to the Department of Accountancy at HSUHK.[10] The donation includes user licenses and corresponding services for one year for Multiable M18 Cloud-based ERP System, which consists of finance module, logistics module, product assembly module as well as business intelligence system.
References[edit]
- ^ "【BrandStory】港企萬達寶 不做「IT狗」：作為研發公司 冒險就是基因 | 蘋果日報•聞庫". 聞庫. 2020-09-07. Retrieved 2024-02-28.
- ^ "Multiable official website".
- ^ "Multiable official website for China region".
- ^ "万达宝软件（深圳）有限公司". 百度百科. Retrieved 2024-02-28.
- ^ "Multiable official website for Malaysia region".
- ^ "Multiable official website for Singapore region".
- ^ "萬達寶公司 - 香港酒店業協會". web.hkha.org (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). 2023-01-27. Retrieved 2024-02-28.
- ^ "Multiable 萬達寶 擴展東南亞生意的好伙伴｜方格子 vocus". vocus.cc (in Traditional Chinese). 2022-09-15. Retrieved 2024-02-28.
- ^ 會計小薯. "2023年香港主流會計軟件比較 – 成長型/中大型企業 - U Blog". U Blog | 分享生活體驗 (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Retrieved 2024-02-28.
- ^ "Software Donation from Multiable Company". sbus.hsu.edu.hk. 2019-06-17. Retrieved 2024-02-21.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.