Draft:Nelson Kwaje
| Submission rejected on 26 August 2023 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by DoubleGrazing 8 months ago. Last edited by Bsherr 14 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 11 April 2023 by Wikieditor019 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. |  |
| Submission declined on 19 November 2022 by Timtrent (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
| Submission declined on 23 August 2022 by Greenman (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. | |
| Submission declined on 21 August 2022 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
| Submission declined on 20 August 2022 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
Comment: The sources (the ones that work, that is) provide only passing mentions, or the subject commenting on things, and/or are primary, and therefore do not establish notability per WP:GNG. In light of this, and the earlier five declines, I can only conclude that the subject is not notable enough to warrant inclusion, and am therefore rejecting this to avoid further reviewer time being expended on this. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: For what is Kwaje notable? WP:ROTM 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Nelson James Kwaje is a South Sudanese Tech and digital rights advocate[1] and the Founder of online fact-checking agency, 211 Check based in Juba, South Sudan.[2]
Career[edit]
Kwaje is the co-founder of Impact Capital Initiative, an East African-based company that works on creating impact through local-led and innovative solutions[3][failed verification]
Kwaje chairs the board of #defyhatenow South Sudan, an organization that works on creating a lasting peace by combating hate speech and incitement to violence[4][5]
Kwaje has also been involved with several initiatives involved in the development of the internet and rights of citizens in Africa such as the Network of African Youth for Development, Internet, Society, ICANN, KICTANet and Africa CMS Summit[6][failed verification]
Awards[edit]
Kwaje was voted among the most influential 100 young Africans in 2020[7][failed verification]
References[edit]
- ^ Chang, Koang (2022-11-12). "Cyber security 'not taken seriously', warns ICT expert". Eye Radio. Retrieved 2023-03-20.
- ^ Ninrew, Chany (2023-06-11). "3 South Sudanese influencers named IGAD peace ambassadors". Eye Radio. Retrieved 2023-06-26.
- ^ "Young South Sudanese Entrepreneurs embrace digital technology to remain afloat during Covid-19 pandemic". OSIEA. 2021-01-29. Retrieved 2022-08-23.
- ^ "Media rights bodies call for the protection of Journalists in South Sudan". Radio Tamazuj. Retrieved 2022-08-23.
- ^ "Beyond the war in South Sudan, youth look at a future driven by technology". The East African. 2021-10-27. Retrieved 2022-08-23.
- ^ "Nelson Kwaje | Kijiji Yeetu". Retrieved 2022-08-21.
- ^ ayadmin (2020-11-03). "2020 100 Most Influential Young Africans List Announced". Africa Youth Awards. Retrieved 2022-08-21.