Draft:Per Capita Media
Submission declined on 6 January 2024 by DaxServer (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 3 January 2024 by Qcne (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Qcne 4 months ago.
|
Per Capita Media (PCM) is a national student newspaper and magazine led by students at the University of Cambridge.[1][2] Founded in August 2023 by Suchir Salhan and Anusha Salhan, the publication is supported by Lady Stothart, Ruth Scurr, a Fellow at Gonville & Caius College.[3]
Notable interviews include John Claughton, the former teacher of Kwarsi Kwarteng.[4] In October 2023, the publication reported testimony from William O'Reilly,[5] a History Professor at the University of Cambridge, who defended and contextualised accusations of plagiarism.[6]
References[edit]
- ^ "Per Capita Media". www.cambridgesu.co.uk. Retrieved 2024-01-03.
- ^ "MuckRack – Per Capita Media". Muck Rack.
- ^ "Contact | PER CAPITA". per-capita.co.uk. 2023-09-05. Retrieved 2024-01-03.
- ^ "PER CAPITA | News Highlights | EXCLUSIVE: "Independent Schools have become their own worst enemies", says former Eton Master". per-capita.co.uk. 2023-11-28. Retrieved 2024-01-03.
- ^ "PER CAPITA | News | Cambridge Professor defends "accidentally" plagiarising his student's essay". per-capita.co.uk. 2023-10-02. Retrieved 2024-01-03.
- ^ "Cambridge professor remains in post despite plagiarism". www.ft.com. Retrieved 2024-01-03.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.