Draft:Piedmont Airlines Flight 1489
Submission declined on 4 August 2023 by SunDawn (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: The incident is not notable enough for inclusion. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:03, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Piedmont Airlines 1489 is a domestic service from Washington D.C to Charlotte.[1]
| Accident | |
|---|---|
| Date | August 3, 1989 |
| Summary | Landing gear Failure |
| Site | Greensboro, North Carolina |
| Total fatalities | 0 |
| Total injuries | 0 |
| Total missing | 0 |
| Total survivors | 107 |
| Operator | Piedmont Airlines (now USAir) |
| Flight origin | Washington D.C |
| Destination | Charlotte |
| Passengers | 101 |
| Crew | 6[2] |
| Fatalities | 0 |
| Injuries | 0 |
| Missing | 0 |
| Survivors | 107 |
Flight[edit]
The flight was a scheduled flight from Washington-National Airport to Charlotte-Douglas.[3]
Investigation[edit]
Investigators found that there were blocks in the jet, later they found that two mechanics put the blocks in the jet and Piedmont Airlines suspended them.[4]
References[edit]
- ^ "PIEDMONT SUSPENDS 2 IN PROBE". The Washington Post. Retrieved 4 Aug 2023.
- ^ "Crippled plane returns to the air Saturday". Retrieved 4 August 2023.
- ^ "2 Mechanics are Suspended after blocks are found in jet". The New York Times. 5 August 1989. Retrieved 4 August 2023.
- ^ "PILOT LAUDED FOR LANDING JET SAFELY DESPITE GEAR TROUBLE". 3 August 1989. Retrieved 4 Aug 2023.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.