Draft:Sora Ventures
| Submission declined on 25 August 2023 by Anachronist (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 23 August 2023 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 21 August 2023 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 20 August 2023 by Greenman (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 1 August 2023 by Jamiebuba (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
Comment: This has been resubmitted multiple times, with each submission showing no acceptable improvement in the sourcing. The last submission included no substantive changes at all, and included zero additional sources to address the concerns of past reivewers, particularly the detailed source analysis given by the last reviewer. Please don't waste a reviewer's time. Address the concerns before re-submitting, otherwise the next submission will result in this draft being rejected, not merely declined. If acceptable evidence of notability according to WP:CORP guidelines doesn't exist yet, then don't re-submit this for review until such evidence can be included. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: In order to establish notability, the topic needs to be discussed in a sufficient number of WP:SIRS-compliant sources. This draft cites four sources: abmedia (source 1), cryptoslate (source 2), blocktempo (source 3), and Asia Crypto Today (source 4). These sources are subject-specific sources and thus not ideal for showing that the subject would be notable outside its topic area. Thus, a sufficient number of WP:SIRS-compliant sources would be higher in this case, because if the subject is not discussed outside its topic area, then at least should the subject be broadly discussed in topic-specific sources. It should be obvious that Sora Ventures is a relevant subject for topic-specific sources. Four topic-specific sources is, in my opinion, not a sufficient number of topic-specific sources to establish any sort of notability. I would advise citing more sources that discuss the subject in broad detail.A brief source analysis reveals that source 1 is not independet per WP:SIRS, because its author Jason Fang is a Sora Ventures managing partner. Source 2 (Refs 2 and 5) is not an independent source per WP:SIRS, as Sora Ventures is an investor in the source. Source 3 could qualify as WP:SIRS-compliant, but it cites various Sora-related parties and it could also be argued that it is thus not independent per WP:SIRS. Source 4 could be considered a WP:SIRS-compliant source, but it has no author information and reminds me of sponsored content.So, we have just two sources that could be used to establish notability, but I have reasonable doubts regarding these two sources. Summing this up, there are no sources that can be used to establish notability. Please cite proper WP:SIRS-compliant sources. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: See WP:NCRYPTO. Also, the first source (definition of venture capital) should be removed, as it makes no mention of the subject and the topic is already described by the wikilink. Greenman (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Please provide reliable sources, that discuss the company WP:INDEPTH. Also see WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources 2 and 4 does not in anyway mention the subject. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 | This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (July 2023) |
| Industry | Asset management |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 |
| Founder | Jason Fang |
| Headquarters | , |
Area served | Taiwan |
| Products | Investments |
| AUM | US$50 million (2023) |
| Website | Official website |
Sora Ventures is a Venture Capital firm that specializes in cryptocurrencies, digital assets, and blockchain investments.
The firm was founded in 2018 by Jason Fang, formerly at Fenbushi Capital, and has portfolio companies covering areas such as decentralized finance, decentralized science[1], bitcoin ecosystems[2] and more.
Sora Ventures is the host of Sora Summit[3], a Web3 conference that was hosted in Macau in 2018[4] and Taipei in 2023[5]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ^ poncho, El (2023-08-19). "什麼是去中心化科學 (DeSci)？Sora Ventures：為何DeSci將是下波Web3巨浪". abmedia (in Chamorro). Retrieved 2023-08-21.
- ^ Wan, Samuel (2023-06-07). "Sora Ventures leads $1.5M funding round for Bitcoin Startup Lab". Cryptoslate. Retrieved 2023-08-01.
- ^ Liu, Ennio (2018-11-14). "Sora Summit 2018: 「因為投機，我們被區塊鏈的魔法所迷惑」". Blocktempo (in Chamorro). Retrieved 2023-08-01.
- ^ "Sora Summit in Macau: Great Opportunity to Join Crypto Ecosystem". Asia Crypto Today. 2018-11-06. Retrieved 2023-08-23.
- ^ Adejumo, Oluwapelumi (2023-08-16). "Sora Summit to close out Taipei blockchain week 2023 with powerhouse speakers". Cryptoslate. Retrieved 2023-08-21.