Draft:Talking Feds Podcast

Submission declined on 22 February 2024 by Chetsford (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Chetsford 3 months ago. Last edited by Chetsford 3 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 26 January 2024 by Chetsford (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Chetsford 3 months ago.

Submission declined on 12 September 2023 by Qcne (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Declined by Qcne 8 months ago.

Comment: Articles must demonstrate WP:N. A podcast whose only references are to the podcast itself, does not do so. Chetsford (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Comment: We cannot accept WP:PRIMARY sources to establish notability under WP:NORG. Qcne (talk) 17:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Meredithcm (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. ((Optional) Marketing producer at Talking Feds)

The Talking Feds Podcast was founded in March, 2019 by former U.S. Attorney Harry Litman who currently serves as the show's host and executive producer. Talking Feds is a weekly, independent roundtable-style podcast that features prominent figures in government, law, and journalism. Guests join Litman for engaging discussions on the most pressing issues of the day from the conflict in Russia and Ukraine to Donald Trump's indictments.^[1] Previous guests on the podcast include Sen. Cory Booker, CNN News anchor Erin Burnett, Rep. Jamie Raskin, journalist Alexi McCammond, Bill Kristol, Stacey Abrams, and Beto O'Rourke.^[2]

Talking Feds has its own YouTube channel with over 100k subscribers where Litman publishes daily videos on current events in the field of law.^[3]

The podcast also runs Instagram, TikTok and X (previously Twitter) pages as well as a weekly newsletter and a Patreon page.

References[edit]

^ "Talking Feds". Talking Feds. Retrieved 2023-09-12.
^ "GUESTS". Talking Feds. Retrieved 2023-09-12.
^ "Talking Feds with Harry Litman - YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 2023-09-12.

[1] "Talking Feds". Talking Feds. Retrieved 2023-09-12.

[2] "GUESTS". Talking Feds. Retrieved 2023-09-12.

[3] "Talking Feds with Harry Litman - YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 2023-09-12.

[1]

[2]

[3]