Draft talk:Aviation Sans Frontiéres

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconAviation NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconOrganizations Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconEnvironment Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis environment-related page is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Aviation without Borders[edit]

Just in case someone points this out - I am aware that Aviation without Borders already has a wikipedia page. However, that page appears to only reference the UK branch of ASF International, and I do not believe it quite meets the notability guidelines all on its own. If this page gets accepted, I would like to propose that Aviation without Borders becomes merged into this page. Thank you for reviewing my article! Miralitt (talk) 23:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Not Adequately Supported by Reliable Sources"[edit]

@Xkalponik Thank you for reviewing my article - however, I noticed that you said it "is not adequately supported by reliable sources". I would love to improve my article, but quite frankly, I do believe that it is already supported by multiple reliable organizations. Other than independent sources, Air France, Michelin, the King Baudouin Foundation, gisAction, and OrbX are all cited. gisAction and OrbX aren't exactly household names, but I wouldn't say that they're unreliable. What would you like to see to improve the article? Miralitt (talk) 13:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Miralitt, Out of the 13 inline sources, 7 are pramary sources. It relies heavily on primary sources which is something we don't allow here. Article needs to have reliable sources that are independent of the subject. But that draft relies too much on primary sources. You need to reduce the number of primary sources and introduce more secondary sources that are independent of the subject. X (talk) 15:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]