Euglyphis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Euglyphis
Euglyphis braganza
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Family: Lasiocampidae
Subfamily: Poecilocampinae
Tribe: Macromphaliini
Genus: Euglyphis
Hübner, [1820]
Synonyms
  • Aselgia Hübner, [1820]
  • Hydrias Herrich-Schäffer, [1854]
  • Claphe Walker, 1855

Euglyphis is a genus of moths in the family Lasiocampidae. The genus was erected by Jacob Hübner in 1820.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Selected species[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Genus Euglyphis • 344 living spp". Catalogue of Life. July 31, 2018. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  2. ^ "200 definitions found for Euglyphis". Nomen.at - Animals and Plants. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  3. ^ "Euglyphis Hübner, 1825". Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Retrieved September 25, 2018. Note: This source gives a year of 1825, while other sources give 1820.
  4. ^ Beccaloni, G.; Scoble, M.; Kitching, I.; Simonsen, T.; Robinson, G.; Pitkin, B.; Hine, A.; Lyal, C., eds. (2003). "Euglyphis​". The Global Lepidoptera Names Index. Natural History Museum. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  5. ^ Pitkin, Brian & Jenkins, Paul (November 5, 2004). "Euglyphis Hübner, 1825". Butterflies and Moths of the World. Natural History Museum, London. Retrieved September 25, 2018. Note: This source gives a year of 1825, while other sources give 1820.
  6. ^ Savela, Markku. "Euglyphis Hübner, [1820]". Lepidoptera and Some Other Life Forms. Retrieved September 25, 2018.

External links[edit]

  • Montero-Ramírez, J.J. ; D.H. Janzen & W. Hallwachs, 2011: A distinctive new species of Euglyphis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) from Costa Rica, with a checklist of the Euglyphis known from Costa Rica. Zootaxa, 3020: 49–59. Preview
  • Zolotuhin, V.V. ; R.V. Efimov ; V.V. Anikin ; A.G. Demin & M.V. Knushevitskaya, 2012: Changes in the suprageneric classification of Lasiocampidae (Lepidoptera) based on the nucleotide sequence of gene EF-1α. Entomological Review 92 (5): 531–547. Abstract: doi:10.1134/S0013873812050065.