Evolution of menopause

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Few animals have a menopause: humans are joined by just four other species in which females live substantially longer than their ability to reproduce. The others are all cetaceans: beluga whales, narwhals, orcas and short-finned pilot whales.[1] There are various theories on the origin and process of the evolution of menopause. These attempt to suggest evolutionary benefits to the human species stemming from the cessation of women's reproductive capability before the end of their natural lifespan. Explanations can be categorized as adaptive and non-adaptive:

Non-adaptive hypotheses[edit]

The high cost of female investment in offspring may lead to physiological deteriorations that amplify susceptibility to becoming infertile. This hypothesis suggests the reproductive lifespan in humans has been optimized, but it has proven more difficult in females and thus their reproductive span is shorter. If this hypothesis were true, however, age at menopause should be negatively correlated with the amount of energy expended to maintain the reproductive organs,[2] and the available data does not support this.[3]

A recent increase in female longevity due to improvements in the standard of living and social care has also been suggested.[4] It is difficult for selection, however, to favor aid to offspring from parents and grandparents.[5] Irrespective of living standards, adaptive responses are limited by physiological mechanisms. In other words, senescence is programmed and regulated by specific genes.[6]

Early human selection shadow[edit]

While it is fairly common for extant hunter-gatherers to live past age 50 provided that they survive childhood, fossil evidence shows that mortality in adults has decreased over the last 30,000 to 50,000 years and that it was extremely unusual for early Homo sapiens to live to age 50. This discovery has led some biologists to argue that there was no selection for or against menopause at the time at which the ancestor of all modern humans lived in Africa, suggesting that menopause is instead a random evolutionary effect of a selection shadow regarding aging in early Homo sapiens. It is also argued that since the population fraction of post-menopausal women in early Homo sapiens was so low, menopause had no evolutionary effect on mate selection or social behaviors related to mate selection.[7][8]

Adaptive hypotheses[edit]

"Survival of the fittest" hypothesis[edit]

This hypothesis suggests that younger mothers and offspring under their care will fare better in a difficult and predatory environment because a younger mother will be stronger and more agile in providing protection and sustenance for herself and a nursing baby. The various biological factors associated with menopause had the effect of male members of the species investing their effort with the most viable of potential female mates.[9][page needed]

A problem with this hypothesis is that, if true, we would expect to see menopause exhibited among many species in the animal kingdom,[10] and another problem is that in the case of extended child development, even a female who was relatively young, still agile, and attractive when producing a child would lose future support from her male partner due to him seeking out fertile mates when she reaches menopause, while the child is still not independent. This would be counterproductive to the supposed adaptation of getting male support, as it would significantly decrease the survival for children produced over much of the female's fertile and agile life, unless children were raised in ways that did not rely on support from a male partner, which would eliminate the supposed evolutionary benefit anyway.[11][12]

Young female preference hypothesis[edit]

The young female preference hypothesis proposes that changes in male preferences for younger mates allowed late-age acting fertility mutations to accumulate in females without any evolutionary penalty, giving rise to menopause. A computer model was constructed to test this hypothesis, and showed that it was feasible.[13] However, in order for deleterious mutations that affect fertility past roughly age fifty to accumulate, human maximum lifespan had to first be extended to about its present value. As of 2016 it was unclear if there has been sufficient time since that happened for such an evolutionary process to occur.[14]

Male-biased philopatry hypothesis[edit]

The male-biased philopatry theory proposes that if human social groups were originally based around men leaving their birth communities more frequently than women, then this leads to increased relatedness to the group in relation to female age, making inclusive fitness benefits older females receive from helping the group greater than what they would receive from continued reproduction, which in turn eventually led to the evolution of menopause.[15] In a pattern of male-biased dispersal and local mating, the relatedness of the individuals in the group decreases with female age, leading to a decrease in kin selection with female age.[15] This occurs because a female will stay with her father in her birth community throughout life, initially being closely related to the males and females. Females are born and stay in the group, so relatedness to the females stays about the same. However, throughout time, the older male relatives will die and any sons she gives birth to will disperse, so that local relatedness to males, and therefore the whole group, declines. The situation is reversed in species where males are philopatric and either females disperse, or mating is non-local.[15] Under these conditions, a female's reproductive life begins away from her father and paternal relatives because she was either born into a new group from non-local mating or because she dispersed. In the case of female-biased dispersal, the female is initially equally unrelated with every individual in the group, and with non-local mating, the female is closely related to the females of the group, but not the males since her paternal relatives are in another group. As she gives birth, her sons will stay with her, increasing her relatedness to males in the group over time and thus her relatedness with the overall group. The common feature that connects these two otherwise different behaviors is male-biased philopatry, which leads to an increase in kin selection with female age.

While not conclusive, evidence does exist to support the idea that female-biased dispersal existed in pre-modern humans. The closest living relatives to humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and both mountain gorillas and western lowland gorillas, are female-biased dispersers.[16] Analysis of sex specific genetic material, the non-recombining portions of the Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA, show evidence of a prevalence of female-biased dispersal as well; however, these results could also be affected by the effective breeding numbers of males and females in local populations.[17] Evidence of female-biased dispersion in hunter-gatherers is not definitive, with some studies supporting the idea,[16] and others suggesting there is no strong bias towards either sex.[18] In orcas, both sexes mate non-locally with members of a different pod but return to the pod after copulation.[19] Demographic data shows that a female's mean relatedness to the group does increase over time due to increasing relatedness to males.[20] While less well-studied, there is evidence that short-finned pilot whales, another menopausal species, also display this behavior.[21] However, mating behavior that increases local relatedness with female age is prevalent in non-menopausal species,[16] making it unlikely that it is the only factor that determines if menopause will evolve in a species.

Mother hypothesis[edit]

The mother hypothesis suggests that menopause was selected for humans because of the extended development period of human offspring and high costs of reproduction so that mothers gain an advantage in reproductive fitness by redirecting their effort from new offspring with a low survival chance to existing children with a higher survival chance.[22]

Grandmother hypothesis[edit]

Main article: Grandmother hypothesis

The Grandmother hypothesis suggests that menopause was selected for humans because it promotes the survival of grandchildren. According to this hypothesis, post-reproductive women feed and care for children, adult nursing daughters, and grandchildren whose mothers have weaned them. Human babies require large and steady supplies of glucose to feed the growing brain. In infants in the first year of life, the brain consumes 60% of all calories, so both babies and their mothers require a dependable food supply. Some evidence suggests that hunters contribute less than half the total food budget of most hunter-gatherer societies, and often much less than half, so that foraging grandmothers can contribute substantially to the survival of grandchildren at times when mothers and fathers are unable to gather enough food for all of their children. In general, selection operates most powerfully during times of famine or other privation. So although grandmothers might not be necessary during good times, many grandchildren cannot survive without them during times of famine. Post-reproductive female orcas tend to lead their pods, especially during years of food scarcity.[23] Furthermore, the increased mortality risk of an orca due to losing a grandmother is stronger in years of food scarcity[24]

Analysis of historical data found that the length of a female's post-reproductive lifespan was reflected in the reproductive success of her offspring and the survival of her grandchildren.[25] Another study found comparative effects but only in the maternal grandmother—paternal grandmothers had a detrimental effect on infant mortality (probably due to paternity uncertainty).[26] Differing assistance strategies for maternal and paternal grandmothers have also been demonstrated. Maternal grandmothers concentrate on offspring survival, whereas paternal grandmothers increase birth rates.[27]

Some believe variations on the mother, or grandmother effect fail to explain longevity with continued spermatogenesis in males (oldest verified paternity is 94 years, 35 years beyond the oldest documented birth attributed to females).[28] Notably, the survival time past menopause is roughly the same as the maturation time for a human child. That a mother's presence could aid in the survival of a developing child, while an unidentified father's absence might not have affected survival, could explain the paternal fertility near the end of the father's lifespan.[29] A man with no certainty of which children are his may merely attempt to father additional children, with support of existing children present but small. Note the existence of partible paternity supporting this.[30] Some argue that the mother and grandmother hypotheses fail to explain the detrimental effects of losing ovarian follicular activity, such as osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, Alzheimer's disease and coronary artery disease.[31]

The theories discussed above assume that evolution directly selected for menopause. Another theory states that menopause is the byproduct of the evolutionary selection for follicular atresia, a factor that causes menopause. Menopause results from having too few ovarian follicles to produce enough estrogen to maintain the ovarian-pituitary-hypothalamic loop, which results in the cessation of menses and the beginning of menopause. Human females are born with approximately a million oocytes, and approximately 400 oocytes are lost to ovulation throughout life.[32][33]

Reproductive conflict hypothesis[edit]

In social vertebrates, the sharing of resources among the group places limits on how many offspring can be produced and supported by members of the group. This creates a situation in which each female must compete with others of the group to ensure they are the one that reproduces.[34] The reproductive conflict hypothesis[35] proposes that this female reproductive conflict favors the cessation of female reproductive potential in older age to avoid reproductive conflict, increasing the older female's fitness through inclusive benefits. Female-biased dispersal or non-local mating leads to an increase in relatedness to the social group with female age.[15] In the human case of female-biased dispersal, when a young female enters a new group, she is not related to any individual and she reproduces to produce an offspring with a relatedness of 0.5. An older female could also choose to reproduce, producing an offspring with a relatedness of 0.5, or she could refrain from reproducing and allow another pair to reproduce. Because her relatedness to males in the group is high, there is a fair probability that the offspring will be her grandchild with a relatedness of 0.25. The younger female experiences no cost to her inclusive fitness from using the resources necessary to successfully rear offspring since she is not related to members of the group, but there is a cost for the older female. As a result, the younger female has the advantage in reproductive competition. Although a female orca born into a social group is related to some members of the group, the whale case of non-local mating leads to similar outcomes because the younger female relatedness to the group as a whole is less than the relatedness of the older female. This behavior makes more likely the cessation of reproduction late in life to avoid reproductive conflict with younger females.

Research using both human and orca demographic data has been published that supports the role of reproductive conflict in the evolution of menopause. Analysis of demographic data from pre-industrial Finnish populations found significant reductions in offspring survivorship when mothers-in-laws and daughters-in-laws had overlapping births,[36] supporting the idea that avoiding reproductive conflict is beneficial to offspring survivorship. Humans, more so than other primates, rely on food sharing for survival,[37] so the large survivorship reduction values could be caused by a straining of community resources. Avoiding such straining is a possible explanation for why the reproductive overlap seen in humans is much lower than other primates.[35] Food sharing is also prevalent among another menopausal species, orcas.[38] Reproductive conflict has also been observed in orcas, with increased calf mortality seen when reproductive overlap between a younger and older generational female occurred.[20]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Guarino B (27 August 2018). "Beluga Whales and Narwhals Go Through the Menopause Too". Retrieved 24 November 2019.
  2. ^ Gaulin SJ (1980). "Sexual Dimorphism in the Human Post-reproductive Life-span: Possible Causes". Journal of Human Evolution. 9 (3): 227–32. doi:10.1016/0047-2484(80)90024-X.
  3. ^ Holmberg I (1970). Fecundity, Fertility and Family Planning. Demography Institute University of Gothenburg Reports (Report). Vol. 10. pp. 1–109.
  4. ^ Washburn SL (981). "Longevity in Primates". In McGaugh JL, Kiesler SB (eds.). Aging: Biology and Behavior. Academic Press. pp. 11–29.
  5. ^ Hawkes K (March 2004). "Human longevity: the grandmother effect". Nature. 428 (6979): 128–9. Bibcode:2004Natur.428..128H. doi:10.1038/428128a. PMID 15014476. S2CID 4342536.
  6. ^ Ricklefs RE, Wikelski M (2002). "The Physiology/Life-history Nexus". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 17 (10): 462–68. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02578-8.
  7. ^ Barash DP, Barash D, Lipton JE (2009). How Women Got Their Curves and Other Just-So Stories: Evolutionary Enigmas. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-14664-7.
  8. ^ Jasienska G, Sherry DS, Holmes DJ (2017). The Arc of Life: Evolution and Health Across the Life Course. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4939-4036-3.
  9. ^ Darwin C. Origin of Species. Archived from the original on 3 October 2013. Retrieved 24 September 2013.
  10. ^ Walker ML, Herndon JG (September 2008). "Menopause in nonhuman primates?". Biology of Reproduction. 79 (3): 398–406. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.108.068536. PMC 2553520. PMID 18495681.
  11. ^ Dusseldorp GL (2009). A view to a kill: Investigating Middle Palaeolithic subsistence using an optimal foraging perspective. Sidestone Press. ISBN 978-9-088-90020-4.
  12. ^ Bjorklund BR, Bee HL (2003). The journey of adulthood (PDF). Florida: Pearson. ISBN 978-1-292-06488-8.
  13. ^ Morton RA, Stone JR, Singh RS (13 June 2013). "Mate choice and the origin of menopause". PLOS Computational Biology. 9 (6): e1003092. Bibcode:2013PLSCB...9E3092M. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003092. PMC 3681637. PMID 23785268.
  14. ^ Takahashi M, Singh RS, Stone J (6 January 2017). "A Theory for the Origin of Human Menopause". Frontiers in Genetics. 7: 222. doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00222. PMC 5216033. PMID 28111590.
  15. ^ a b c d Johnstone RA, Cant MA (December 2010). "The evolution of menopause in cetaceans and humans: the role of demography". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 277 (1701): 3765–71. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0988. PMC 2992708. PMID 20591868.
  16. ^ a b c Lawson Handley LJ, Perrin N (April 2007). "Advances in our understanding of mammalian sex-biased dispersal". Molecular Ecology. 16 (8): 1559–78. Bibcode:2007MolEc..16.1559L. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03152.x. PMID 17402974.
  17. ^ Ségurel L, Martínez-Cruz B, Quintana-Murci L, Balaresque P, Georges M, Hegay T, Aldashev A, Nasyrova F, Jobling MA, Heyer E, Vitalis R (September 2008). "Sex-specific genetic structure and social organization in Central Asia: insights from a multi-locus study". PLOS Genetics. 4 (9): e1000200. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000200. PMC 2535577. PMID 18818760.
  18. ^ Sugiyama Y (July 2017). "Sex-biased dispersal of human ancestors". Evolutionary Anthropology. 26 (4): 172–180. doi:10.1002/evan.21539. PMID 28815964. S2CID 19996159.
  19. ^ Bigg MA, Olesiuk PF, Ellis GM, Ford JK, Balcomb KC (1 January 1990). "Social organization and genealogy of resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the coastal waters of British Columbia and Washington State". Report of the International Whaling Commission. 12: 383–405.
  20. ^ a b Croft DP, Johnstone RA, Ellis S, Nattrass S, Franks DW, Brent LJ, Mazzi S, Balcomb KC, Ford JK, Cant MA (January 2017). "Reproductive Conflict and the Evolution of Menopause in Killer Whales". Current Biology. 27 (2): 298–304. Bibcode:2017CBio...27..298C. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.015. hdl:10871/24920. PMID 28089514.
  21. ^ Heimlich-Boran JR (1993). Social organisation of the short-finned pilot whale, Globicephala macrorhynchus, with special reference to the comparative social ecology of delphinids (Doctoral thesis). University of Cambridge.
  22. ^ Peccei JS (2001). "Menopause: Adaptation or Epiphenomenon?". Evolutionary Anthropology. 10 (2): 43–57. doi:10.1002/evan.1013. S2CID 1665503.
  23. ^ Brent LJ, Franks DW, Foster EA, Balcomb KC, Cant MA, Croft DP (March 2015). "Ecological knowledge, leadership, and the evolution of menopause in killer whales". Current Biology. 25 (6): 746–750. Bibcode:2015CBio...25..746B. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.037. hdl:10871/32919. PMID 25754636. S2CID 3488959.
  24. ^ Nattrass S, Croft DP, Ellis S, Cant MA, Weiss MN, Wright BM, et al. (December 2019). "Postreproductive killer whale grandmothers improve the survival of their grandoffspring". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 116 (52): 26669–26673. Bibcode:2019PNAS..11626669N. doi:10.1073/pnas.1903844116. PMC 6936675. PMID 31818941.
  25. ^ Lahdenperä M, Lummaa V, Helle S, Tremblay M, Russell AF (March 2004). "Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women" (PDF). Nature. 428 (6979): 178–81. Bibcode:2004Natur.428..178L. doi:10.1038/nature02367. PMID 15014499. S2CID 4415832.
  26. ^ Voland E, Beise J (November 2002). "Opposite effects of maternal and paternal grandmothers on infant survival in historical Krummhörn". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 52 (6): 435–443 10.1007/s00265-002–0539-2. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0539-2. S2CID 24382325.
  27. ^ Mace R, Sear R (2004). "Are Humans Communal Breeders?". In Voland E, Chasiotis A, Schiefenhoevel W (eds.). Grandmotherhood – the Evolutionary Significance of the Second Half of Female Life. Rutgers University Press.
  28. ^ Finch CE (1994). Longevity, Senescence, and the Genome (Pbk. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-24889-9.
  29. ^ Pavard S, Sibert A, Heyer E (May 2007). "The effect of maternal care on child survival: a demographic, genetic, and evolutionary perspective". Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution. 61 (5): 1153–61. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00086.x. PMID 17492968. S2CID 13118937.
  30. ^ Walker RS, Flinn MV, Hill KR (November 2010). "Evolutionary history of partible paternity in lowland South America". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107 (45): 19195–200. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10719195W. doi:10.1073/pnas.1002598107. PMC 2984172. PMID 20974947.
  31. ^ Massart F, Reginster JY, Brandi ML (November 2001). "Genetics of menopause-associated diseases". Maturitas. 40 (2): 103–16. doi:10.1016/S0378-5122(01)00283-3. PMID 11716989.
  32. ^ Leidy L. "Menopause in evolutionary perspective". In Trevathan WR, McKenna JJ, Smith EO (eds.). Evolutionary Medicine'. Oxford University Press. pp. 407–427.
  33. ^ Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (3 ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. 2014. p. 69. ISBN 9780702054105.
  34. ^ Clutton-Brock TH, Hodge SJ, Spong G, Russell AF, Jordan NR, Bennett NC, Sharpe LL, Manser MB (December 2006). "Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals". Nature. 444 (7122): 1065–8. Bibcode:2006Natur.444.1065C. doi:10.1038/nature05386. PMID 17183322. S2CID 4397323.
  35. ^ a b Cant MA, Johnstone RA (April 2008). "Reproductive conflict and the separation of reproductive generations in humans". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (14): 5332–6. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.5332C. doi:10.1073/pnas.0711911105. PMC 2291103. PMID 18378891.
  36. ^ Lahdenperä M, Gillespie DO, Lummaa V, Russell AF (November 2012). "Severe intergenerational reproductive conflict and the evolution of menopause". Ecology Letters. 15 (11): 1283–1290. Bibcode:2012EcolL..15.1283L. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01851.x. PMID 22913671.
  37. ^ Jaeggi AV, Gurven M (July 2013). "Natural cooperators: food sharing in humans and other primates". Evolutionary Anthropology. 22 (4): 186–95. doi:10.1002/evan.21364. PMID 23943272. S2CID 25989629.[permanent dead link]
  38. ^ Wright BM, Stredulinsky EH, Ellis GM, Ford JK (May 2016). "Kin-directed food sharing promotes lifetime natal philopatry of both sexes in a population of fish-eating killer whales, Orcinus orca". Animal Behaviour. 115: 81–95. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.025.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolution_of_menopause&oldid=1212834677"