File talk:Treatment of multiple sclerosis.ogg
Spoken article quality assessment[edit]
Version reviewed: 1/26/2008
Technical quality: Medium.
- Still a few problems with popping and plosives, but good overall.
- GNU license statement not given at end of article as per Spoken Wikipedia recording guidelines. Only real reason for "Medium" rating.
Clarity: High.
- Minor issues with volume changes between takes/editing, and pacing.
- Excellent pronunciations of complex medical terms.
Accuracy: High.
- There either seemed to be significant ad-libbing from Section 3 onward, or the article version linked maybe be slightly out of date. In either case, they did not compromise the meaning of the source text.
Notes: {{{notes}}}
Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.
Reviewed by: Reason turns rancid (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)