Module talk:Road data/strings/USA/CA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconU.S. Roads: California Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis module is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
TemplateThis module does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Locations
 
WikiProject iconCalifornia Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis module is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis module does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Interstate shields[edit]

Shouldn't the shields for California Interstate highways look like the ones actually used in Cali? Why are we using generic shields for Interstates and Interstate Business Routes in that state? Greggens (talk) 19:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because at 20px tall, you can't read the California legend anyway. The generic signs, which were created from California's guide sign spec (link), also have a larger number than the independent route markers. As for the Interstate business shields, Caltrans doesn't provide a spec for them. I don't see using the "generic" business shields as being that big of a deal. However, if we actually want California-specific business shields, I'll make a set to the G27-2 spec (link) rather than using a previous version that wasn't even a good one. –Fredddie 20:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I just went ahead and made them. commons:Category:California Business Interstate Highway shields. –Fredddie 21:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]