Module talk:Sports rbr table

Module:Sports rbr table is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible module. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit.

Football Template‑class

	Association football portal This module is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Template	This module does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sports rbr table module.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 90 days

To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, Module talk:Sports rbr table/matchup redirects here.

header param on /matchup[edit]

Re: message from diff on Template:NCAA Season 93 women's volleyball match-up results:

Frietjes, I do not see any other possible values to customise |header=, so it will always be Team ╲ Game. If you intend to set |header=Elimination round as seen in the linked diff, I think it would be appropriate to use |title= parameter instead. – McVahl (talk) 01:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Number of games[edit]

Not all leagues have the teams play other teams the same number of times. In cases where that is the case, you can't use this. Perhaps editors can manually assign how many games are/will be played. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:45, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vertical Line Separation[edit]

Hi! In the football calendar this season, the FIFA World Cup resulted in almost all leagues halting for a period of 4 or more weeks. As a result, I was wondering whether anyone would be able to add a parameter in which a 3px grey vertical line can be placed after a given column to indicate a small break in league play? Thanks in advance! 82.26.206.44 (talk) 01:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i added splitV, splitH, Module:Sports rbr table/sandbox Quri.inka (talk) 23:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 4 April 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I would like to update the module with my revision of Module:Sports rbr table/sandbox (permalink, diff). My changes simplify the module code by trimming some redundancy, along with fixing a minor error (an attempt to use regex \ to escape a character instead of Lua's %). Although there's no testcases page for the module, I've tested my changes using all 4 examples in the module documentation, as well as on the current revision (as of writing) of 1954 Footscray Football Club season to verify the addition of Category:Pages using sports rbr table with dubious updated parameter, and the sandbox version produced the exact same results as the current version. {{Lemondoge|Talk|Contributions}} 19:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Broken[edit]

To my knowledge, this template seems to be broken right now. Refer to 2023 Kansas City Current season and 2023 Houston Dash season in the Results by Matchday sections. Could someone please fix this? I have checked and am sure that there's a template issue since the pages pages I mentioned haven't changed their content in these areas to produce this error message. Thank you. Listen1st (talk) 14:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted change above. @Lemondoge: FYI — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just had a quick look at this. It appears the commenting out of 2 very basic functions caused it to error, as one of them was used almost immediately in the table function here. To be fair to lemondoge, the way this module works is that it requires itself without considering the sandbox subpage, meaning that this error wouldn't show up in sandbox version tests, as it actually used the live version for grabbing the style related functions which weren't commented out at the time. The module should work now if anyone would like to test it further, and errors should appear in sandbox tests in this scenario should it happen again. Aidan9382 _(talk) 16:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]