Politics as Usual (book)
 | |
| Author | Thomas Pogge |
|---|---|
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Philosophy |
| Publisher | Polity, 2010 |
| Media type | |
| Pages | 224 pages |
| ISBN | 978-0745638935 |
| Preceded by | World Poverty and Human Rights |
| Followed by | Are We Violating the Human Rights of the World’s Poor? |
Politics as Usual: What Lies Behind the Pro-Poor Rhetoric is a 2010 book by Thomas Pogge.[1] The book is a discussion on issues of global significance and their relationship to poverty.[2] Politics as Usual is based on previously compiled essays.[3] Pogge's book present an alternate view than the one where "Education, health-care, technology, and political participation are becoming ever more universal, empowering human beings everywhere to enjoy security, economic sufficiency, equal citizenship, and a life in dignity." according to Crop. He presents one where Poverty and oppression persist on a massive scale, one where the affluent states and international organizations knowingly contribute and even benefit from these evils.[4]
Overview[edit]
Thomas Pogge covers a number of political and philosophical topics including Negative Duties,[3] In World Poverty and Human Rights Pogge had argued that Western states are complicit and in Politics as Usual he expands and analyzes different aspects of Global poverty. The book notes that the bottom half of the world's population has seen its wealth shrink to 1.1%, with global household income shrinking to 3%, during the same period that the top 10% have seen their shares rise to 85.1 and 71.1%, respectively.[5][6] This is due to the affluent countries having power to formulate policies while the poorest countries must take the blunt of the global repercussions of these policies, according to Pogge.[7] This can change due to people in the affluent countries becoming aware of their effect on worldwide poverty and pressuring their politicians to take action,[8] or at least to "do no harm".[9] He further contends that organizations such as the World Trade Organization have a deeper moral obligation than individuals or governments because they are moral agents of the global poor.[10]
Content[edit]
War on terror[edit]
Pogge addresses Islamist terror attacks in New York, London, and Madrid. The attackers may have justified their attacks seeking a greater good but the attacks of innocents failed the greater good test even among the attackers standards.[11] He expands to state that the terrorists were wrong to attack in the name of religion and that the governments are also at fault for the war on terror because they inflict harm upon the innocents without considering the moral implications.[12]
International reforms[edit]
Thomas Pogge contends that we are violating our negative duty not to harm the poor by supporting oppressive regimes which further cements their position.[13] Pogge states that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights gives people specific economic rights and including "Everyone has a right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care.", which is violated by the international economic system we now have.[9]
Reviews[edit]
Ruth Jack of The Kelvingrove Review states that Pogge's argument that world leaders not only allow the status quo to persist but actively and knowingly collude to maintain it for their own ends is not convincing while Pogge's statistical analysis of the depth of world poverty are accurate.[2]
S. Subramanian states that the book makes for painful reading, not because of the author but because of the topic, it states many crimes against humanity,[3] also described as "unimaginable cost of lives as a result of injustices against the poor addressed by his work".[7]
References[edit]
- ^ "Politics as Usual: What Lies Behind the Pro-Poor Rhetoric". Polity Books. Retrieved 5 June 2015.
- ^ a b Jack, Ruth. "The Kelvingrove Review" (PDF). University of Glasgow. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
- ^ a b c Subramanian, S. "S. Subramanian finds uncomfortable reading in the power play between the North and the South". Times Higher Education. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
- ^ "Politics as Usual: What Lies Behind the Pro-Poor Rhetoric". CROP. Retrieved 10 June 2015.
- ^ Robinson, Charles. "Politics as Usual Review". Retrieved 9 June 2015.
- ^ Elizabeth, Kahn (2012). "Global Economic Justice: a Structural Approach". Public Reason 4.
- ^ a b Appiah, Solomon. "Thomas Pogge: Who is Responsible for Global Poverty". Africa Arise. Retrieved 10 June 2015.
- ^ Jaggar, Alison M., ed. (2010). Thomas Pogge and his critics (1. publ. ed.). Cambridge: Polity. p. 215. ISBN 9780745642574.
- ^ a b Boyne, Ian. "Poverty: A Human-Rights Violation". The Gleaner. Retrieved 10 June 2015.
- ^ Deveaux, Monique (21 March 2015). "The Global Poor as Agents of Justice". Journal of Moral Philosophy. 12 (2): 129. doi:10.1163/17455243-4681029. S2CID 153500320.
- ^ Blunt, Gwilym David (1 September 2011). "Thomas Pogge, Politics as Usual: What Lies Behind Pro-Poor Rhetoric" (PDF). Opticon 1826. 6 (11). doi:10.5334/opt.111114. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
- ^ Miller, Chris (15 January 2010). War on terror. The Oxford Amnesty Lectures. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-07190-7975-7.
- ^ Timmermann, Cristian (2012). "The Health Impact Fund and the Right to Participate in the Advancement of Science" (PDF). European Journal of Applied Ethics. 1 (1): 2. Retrieved 10 June 2015.