Talk:Đăk Nông province
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Han tu[edit]
The Nom Foundation gives 多農, while the Chinese Wikipedia gives 得農. Badagnani (talk) 06:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Blanking[edit]
It is not clear that the written place name 多農 did not exist (and was written in Sino-Vietnamese characters by official Vietnamese sources) before the actual official province was given this name. Badagnani (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's the onus of the person who added this information to show that it existed, not the other way around. DHN (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
The characters came directly from a Nom Foundation researcher. Badagnani (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- You should ask that they publish it and then use it as your source. DHN (talk) 20:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Requested move[edit]
Đắk Nông province → Đắk Nông Province – Revert capitalization to pre-Kauffner status and current consensus. NVanMinh (talk) 17:49, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress[edit]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:An Giang province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:59, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress[edit]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:An Giang Province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
