Talk:.38 Super

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Headstamp[edit]

My Speer #13 manual says that the official headstamp is "38 Super Auto +P" to help differentiate between modern 38 Super ammo and older Colt 38 ACP ammo. I'm not sure if this has ever been a real problem, though, at least not since the 1950s, as I don't think there have been many pistols chambered for the lower powered 38 ACP other than Colt's 1900/1902 models.

I have some doubts about the appeal of the 38 Super as an armour-peircing round, and particularly its development to fight 1930s gangsters armored cars.

It has been reported in some cable TV documentaries that *Browning Automatic Rifles* (BARs) were popular with some gangsters (Dillon and/or Bonnie and Clyde) and some law enforcement officers (those that ambushed Bonnie & Clyde used a BAR, in addition to other weapons) due to the .30-06 rifle cartridge's ability to penetrate car sheet metal. But this preference was established large because of the inability of PISTOL rounds to reliably punch through cars, and the BAR used a real rifle round.

Other strikes against this theory are the fact that Colt released it in 1929, long before the 1930s gangster phenomenon, and currently the number of 38 Super pistols available is pretty small and usually limited to high-end target and competition weapons.

The .357 Magnum notion is even less so -- the .357 Mag was originally sold as the ."357 Registered Magnum" and was literally "registered" by S&W and sold in limited numbers as a collectors item. It became popular and had some hunting appeal, and gainsed popularity with some law enforcement organizations due its increased power and backwards compatibility with the widely-used .38 Special.

I don't doubt that some law enforcement organizations and even some specific "famous" officers claimed 38 Super or 357 Mag as armor piercing rounds, but that's relative to 45 Auto and 38 Special, not an absolute.

Most likely, by "armor" they would've been referring to the padded vests popular among criminals of the time, which .38 Super and .357 Magnum would indeed pierce far more effectively than the low-velocity .45 ACP. Whether .38 Super was developed for that purpose has no bearing on whether it got the job done, which it and .357 Magnum both did. 71.203.209.0 03:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Special Operations substantiation[edit]

I'd like to see the claims that this is an armor-piercing-capable round substantiated. I've never heard that, and am an avid .38 Super shooter. Furthermore, specops seem to use carbines rather than pistol rounds for close work (observe the springfield 16 socom, and FN SCAR rifles, to say nothing of the M4). Avriette 20:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Any projectile with enough speed behind it becomes armor piercing by sheer physics. For example there's the 7.62x25 Tokarev pistol round; It's construction is the same as any other FMJ ball round, simply lead with a copper jacket. But it's speed allows it to easily defeat Class II vests. --Mfree 17:36, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WPMILHIST[edit]

The WPMILHIST tag has been removed due to this article not being military related.--Oldwildbill 09:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

.38 ACP[edit]

I have to disagree that the .38 ACP was Browning's least successful semi-rimmed cartridge. That dishonor would go to the 9mm Browning Long. According to Bady's "Colt Automatic Pistols," the Colt M1902 Military Model and M1903 Pocket Hammer Model pistols in .38 ACP were popular enough that Colt kept them in production until 1927. This is, of course, when the .38 Super was introduced. D.E. Watters 04:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be split?[edit]

.38 ACP and .38 Super may have basically the same dimensions and a shared design history, but the same is true of the 7.63x25 Mauser and 7.62x25 Tokarev. Or, for that matter, 7.62×51 NATO and .308 Winchester. For all their similarities, they're not the same cartridge. 71.203.209.0 03:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DONE I thought it was strange myself. They should have their own articles. Arthurrh 03:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural info[edit]

Some mention should be made of two facts -- first, the .38 Super was the 38-cal velocity champ until S&W introduced the .357 Mag in the mid-1930s; second, it was popular in Mexico where civilian possession of arms in "military calibers" -- such as 9mm Luger and .45 ACP -- was prohibited. -- Craig Goodrich 68.227.19.99 (talk) 18:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC) I found link http://www.accuratepowder.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/accurate_load_data_3.5.pdf working it has 38 super load data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.203.10 (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:48, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Performance[edit]

The article currently indicates higher velocity than 9mm parabellum +P+. Comparing to the data in the 9x19mm Parabellum article, this is not quite true. It would be accurate to say that the .38 Super exceeds 9mm +P velocities, but not +P+. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.90.194.27 (talk) 19:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

9x19mm +P+ is not a standard, as mentioned in the 9x19mm article, it is a designation used by some manufactures to indicate pressures beyond that of SAAMI +P. If you ignore SAAMI standards (in which .38 Super is handicapped because of legacy .38 ACP guns and unsupported 1911 barrels) the .38 Super cartridge has more case capacity so if the right powders are used, it should be able to out perform 9x19mm. For a better explanation, http://38super.net/Pages/comparisons.html

Zaphar (talk) 09:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Link 3[edit]

Reference 1 at the bottom is 404 Not Found as of 11-8-2015

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on .38 Super. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:.38_Super&oldid=1212524218"