Talk:1876 Louisville Grays season

Baseball: Old-time Base Ball Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Old-time Base Ball task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Louisville Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as Low-importance).

Baseball assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:1876 Louisville Grays season/Comments (baseball), and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article demandss a stub rating for the moment. It neither offers a roster list nor a rundown of the season. It provides a team standings table, and there are some incomplete tables at the bottom (even if these are filled in, the article would not be start-class rated in my opinion). Filling the article with information about how to season played out would be very helpful to readers. Right now, the audience has a table of wins and losses. Indeed finding credible information from the year may be difficult, but providing comprehensive information from so long ago should not be simple. Images such a pictures might be next to impossible to locate and upload. I'm rating this as a stub. Please, feel free to weigh in. Thanks Fdssdf (talk) 07:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 07:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)