Talk:1877 FA Cup final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1877 FA Cup final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star1877 FA Cup final is part of the Wanderers F.C. series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 22, 2009Good article nomineeListed
April 27, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
April 21, 2024Good topic removal candidateKept
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:1877 FA Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: -- BigDom 19:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Generally a well written article, just have a few minor points:

Lead
  • "Oxford has also previously won the tournament" – seems to be in the wrong tense
Route to the final
  • "replay" – could be wikilinked
  • "Wanderers beat the other of the great universities, Cambridge University 1–0" – needs another comma after University
Summary
  • In the last sentence of the first paragraph, the stadium should be named as it is the first mention of it in the section
  • "giving the university team the lead" – in previous mentions, "university" has been capitalised
  • "the cup holders held" – "holders" and then "held" is a bit repetitive
External links
  • If the match report is "inaccurate", there doesn't seem to be much point linking to it

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Also, I have added this review to my watchlist. Thanks, -- BigDom 20:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:30, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Points addressed - pass with congratulations. -- BigDom 21:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 23:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1872 FA Cup Final which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]