Talk:1893 South Australian colonial election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: South Australia / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal 1893 South Australian colonial election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Who was the 10th Labor MP?[edit]

Got nine here. Who was the 10th? Timeshift (talk) 11:39, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poynton in Flinders, according to Jaensch. The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:59, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 14:59, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal(ism) MP's[edit]

Anyone know of anyway to find out how many of these Independents were actually Liberal(ism) orientated? --Linkqer (talk) 14:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There weren't formal parties - just loose liberal/conservative blocs. Very difficult to label the less prominent MPs and some of the attempts at it (such as Dean Jaensch's electoral data) verge into questionable guesswork in my book. (I have picked a ton of holes in that publication where the affiliation he stated was provably wrong.) The Drover's Wife (talk) 16:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]