Talk:1922–23 Nelson F.C. season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1922–23 Nelson F.C. season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 17, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 19, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Nelson F.C. won the Football League Third Division North in the 1922–23 season?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nelson F.C. season 1922–23/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 12:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will be the reviewer for this article. I'll begin a read through now and add notes from any issues raised as I come across them. Miyagawa (talk) 12:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Might it be worthwhile adding the team's colours to the infobox? I note they're on the previous season's infobox and although the team photo is in black and white I doubt that the strip significantly changed as teams back then didn't tend to change their colours that much (really even in the modern game it's only the second and third strips that change at all). Miyagawa (talk) 12:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find any other issues, so time for the review template....

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Overall, a very fine piece of work and an interesting article. Miyagawa (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]