Talk:1966 NASA T-38 crash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1966 NASA T-38 crash has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star1966 NASA T-38 crash is the main article in the 1966 NASA T-38 crash series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 13, 2012Good article nomineeListed
November 19, 2019Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 27, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that astronauts Elliot See and Charles Bassett died when their plane crashed into the building where their spacecraft was being assembled?
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:1966 NASA T-38 crash/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Resident Mario (talk · contribs) 04:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Nice, short article. ResMar 04:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • The first sentence should be reconfigured to the more standard "The X was when Y happened".
  • The lead should mention the weather conditions at the time of the accident.
Infobox
The crash
  • By the roof, do you mean the building roof, or the plane roof?
Investigation and aftermath

Flight Ceiling?[edit]

The description of the accident contains this sentence:

"Weather at Lambert Field in St. Louis was poor, with rain, snow, and fog, broken clouds at 800 feet (240 m) and a flight ceiling of 1,500 feet (460 m), requiring an instrument approach."

That doesn't make any sense. Flight ceiling is another term for "absolute ceiling" which is how high an aircraft is capable of level flying and in the T-38's case is 50,000. It is not dependent on weather. I believe the sentence author misinterpreted a reference in the source to cloud ceiling, which is the height of the base of the lowest cloud that covers more than half the sky.

I'm going to change the text and the link. --2601:602:9A00:3526:8C03:BE17:480D:81C4 (talk) 12:55, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Go ahead. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If the sky was broken at 800 ft, that would be the cloud ceiling. Perhaps it was broken at 800 ft and overcast at 1500 ft? N9XTN (talk) 01:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath[edit]

Does there need to be so much detail of the aftermath in the heading section ? Can't that be left in the main body (where it is duplicated) ? -- Beardo (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]