Talk:1997 Indonesian forest fires

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Droughts / Wildfires Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Droughts and wildfires task force (assessed as Low-importance).

help needed[edit]

Need some help in finding sources and writing references. all help appreciated. Cheers. Nunamiut (talk) 11:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessed[edit]

That is why it is classed as a stub - articles like these without WP:RS and WP:CITE are slightly problematic to say the least Satu Suro 13:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And the fact that 1997 Southeast Asian haze article has already existed for over two years makes it even more odd, than problematic - they should be merged Satu Suro 13:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]