This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
1997 Women's Cricket World Cup final is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Would the Ireland match have been counted in the final table standings? If so, would be worth explaining how they awarded points for it.
Have added a little, let me know if you think more is needed (in which case, I would need to explain the whole scoring system.) Harriastalk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Worth linking wickets and One Day International again here.
Emily Drumm is linked here but there is a Drumm mentioned in their route to the final section. I'm assuming it's the same one so the link needs moving up.
Along similar lines, you drop the first name for Fitzpatrick, but include the first name for Hockley (and Drumm if the above point is agreed) in the same sentence.
Note b is a little oddly placed as it seems to be describing the scoring method, but at this point it's halfway through the article and there are frequent uses of it prior.
Moved to the first use. Harriastalk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In all honesty, I could probably pass this now and have no complaints as it's a very well-written piece. A couple of minor suggestions and adjustments above that could be looked at though, so placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 08:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Kosack: Many thanks for the review. I have responded to each point above. Harriastalk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm happy with all of the responses to the queries above, nice work. Happy to promote. Kosack (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]