Talk:1999 Saskatchewan general election

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1999 Saskatchewan general election article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Saskatchewan / Governments / Politics Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph of Elwin Hermanson be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that a photograph of Jim Melenchuk be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

You don't remember the Channel Lake hearings in the Legislature's Crown Corporations Commitee, including the calling of a number of witnesses including Jack Messer, Laurie Portigal, etc., concerning the affairs leading to the botched sale of Channel Lake Petroleum and the subsequent dismissal (with $300k severance) granted to Jack Messer, a NDP political appointment?

It was front-page news in Saskatchewan in 1998/99 and the words, "Channel Lake" will yield a lot of hits on www.legassembly.sk.ca/Hansard . And if you search Google (or your favourite search engine) for the old Saskatchewan Party website, you will see many press releases.

Also, in 1998, there was another scandal at SaskPower that figured into the election, concerning the locking out of utility workers, and then actually legislating them back to work. These were all election issues, and were some of the major reasons behind the NDP only winning a minority of members in 1999.

64.110.251.69 01:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a minor nit as well -- "Some New Democrats who were unhappy with the cautious government of Roy Romanow had left the party to form the New Green Alliance, an environmentalist party. This party failed to make a significant impact, winning only 1% of the popular vote, and no seats in the legislature." is loaded with POV. Politics (and all articles relating to it) intrinsically must contain at least some POV, so obviously a deletion isn't in order, but obviously caution must be exercised.

64.110.251.69 02:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this passage should probably be reworded. CJCurrie 02:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]