Talk:2000 French Grand Prix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 French Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Any number between one and twelve should be spelled out.
    Corrected the number issue Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    The pictures of Coulthard and Häkkinen could be moved down a little, but it's not a deal-breaker.
    Done Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass:
    Just fix the minor issue with the spelling out of numbers that should be and this will be a pass.--Nascar king 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nascarking: All the issues have been fixed. Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Then I hereby give 2000 French Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 19:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]