Talk:2007 Florida Gators football team

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ole Miss NPOV[edit]

The Ole Miss game is very biased with phrases like "The 2007 Florida Gators finally looked like the inexperienced squad that they are during their contest against the Ole Miss Rebels in Oxford, Mississippi." You can state their inexperience, however you do not have to state that they "looked" inexperienced without stating in what specific ways for every time throughout the game that they were inexperienced. Professor Davies 15:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The comment is not insulting or biased in favor or against Florida. It's a simple fact that was repeated by Coach Meyer before and after the game and was mentioned prominently in pre- and post-game media coverage. (For a few examples, click here, here, and here.) If you continue reading the wikipedia version, you'll note that the next paragraph explains the remark and gives an example. There are other examples, of course, but mentioning every mistake would make the section much too long for a quick recap that's only a minor part of a longer article.
And the banner you added doesn't apply. You may disagree with the opening phrase, but the section is clearly neither a "personal story" nor written in an "informal tone." It'd fit right into a set of AP college football recaps, imo. Zeng8r 20:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, Wikipedia has a higher standing of writing than AP sports-writing or sports-writing in general. Our articles should be more matter-of-fact, with less flowery or overly descriptive language, and of course, written from a neutral POV. AUTiger » talk 22:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I was going to suggest that we each start the game recaps of next Saturday's game on the opposing team's page, just as a fun test of objective writing skills, but I see that Auburn's 2007 season page doesn't have any recaps. Somebody should really get on it, imo; rough start or no, Auburn's a major program that should be well documented on this site. Zeng8r 23:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I missed this comment somehow, but as for the 2007 summaries, I'll try to catch them up - I haven't had much free time between games and work, etc. But take a look at 2006 Auburn Tigers football team and I think you'll find the game capsules are very neutral. AUTiger » talk 04:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Actually, Wikipedia has a higher standing of writing than AP sports-writing or sports-writing in general." LOL, how did I miss that whopper??? Thanks for the best laugh I've had all day... Zeng8r 02:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 3[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2007 Florida Gators football team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]