Talk:2008 Australian federal budget

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV tag[edit]

The article seems very heavily biased and lopsided. It pretty much wraps up how the opposition would view the government's budget. I refer in particular to the first paragraph. The next two paragraphs are outside criticism of the budget, the last two paras are quite balanced however. POV tag added. Timeshift (talk) 07:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, the article is very POV-ey and all over the shop. I've moved third party comment to its own section. I was thinking we could also have a section "Opposition and cross-bench response". That way we can deal with the POV problems by representing each major viewpoint (as per WP:NPOV). I don't think neutral text is possible in this article because it would end up being a 'factual' coverage of the budget, which would essentially be parroting the government line. --Surturz (talk) 03:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

From an old copy of The Age:

  • Miller, Nick (2008-05-14). "$10bn fund to resuscitate struggling hospital system". The Age. p. Budget08 supplement (p. 2).
  • Topsfield, Jewel (2008-05-14). "Doors open for newcomers to combat skills shortage". The Age. p. Budget08 supplement (p. 2).
  • Tomazin, Farrah (2008-05-14). "Funding overhaul for unis and TAFEs". The Age. p. Budget08 supplement (p. 3). Retrieved 2009-04-22.
  • Hammer, Chris; Morton, Adam (2008-05-14). "Clean energy must wait for money". The Age. p. Budget08 supplement (p. 3). Retrieved 2009-04-22.
  • Nicholson, Brendan (2008-05-14). "PM pulls surprise to follow Howard's funding lead". The Age. p. Budget08 supplement (p. 8). Retrieved 2009-04-22.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2008 Australian federal budget. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]