Talk:2008 French mistaken virginity case

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suggestions are welcome!

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: nice work!.

North8000 (talk) 12:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 June 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to 2008 French mistaken virginity case. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 21:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The annulment of a marriage due to mistaken virginity2008 French mistaken virginity controversy – This article is about a specific incident rather than the general concept of annulling a marriage due to mistaken virginity. All the article's references are in French, so I do not think this event has an English-language WP:COMMONNAME. I am open to other suggestions. Rublov (talk) 17:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. The proposed title is undoubtedly more natural and precise than the current title. It still doesn't feel great, but I think this is a case where it's very difficult to come up with a non-awkward descriptive title. Colin M (talk) 21:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nominator and Colin M. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. But would prefer 2008 French mistaken virginity case. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:53, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree, "case" is better than "controversy" here. Rublov (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I would support this option as well. And it's somewhat closer to the term used in the fr title, affaire. Colin M (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.