Talk:2009–10 Belgian Pro League

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mouscron[edit]

Although Mouscron keeps stalling and trying to find new investors, it looks more and more like they will soon be bankrupt and removed from the league. Very likely, their matches will get annulled. How will we handle this? I suggest we put Mouscron at the bottom with zero matches played, zero goals for and zero against, possibly with an extra note as they won't drop to second division but probably either stop as an organization or be put back to third division (we'll have to await the exact details). We could remove the results from the results table, or add something like NP (Not played) in all squares for matches that were scheduled and leave the rest with a note added. The "Positions by round" will change suddenly, as with the results against Mouscron annulled, some teams will shift places. As of now, Lokeren loses 6 pts, Anderlecht, Cercle, Westerlo, Germinal Beerschot and Zulte-Waregem 3 pts while Club Brugge, Roeselare, Standard, Gent and Kortrijk lose 1 pt. (These numbers will probably change). Ideally, we would add another column in this table, but I don't know if that is so easily done, as this would require editing the template... Another thing we could to is just 'update' the places after the next matchday. So imagine Mouscron is deleted in between matchdays 25 and 26, then we keep everything 'normal' up and with matchday 25 and just 'update' the positions after matchday 26 (with Mouscron at position 16 for all future matchdays). Probably a note is needed too... Also, the goalscorers' list will probably be changed, I have it all in Excel so I can mention in short which players lost most goals if wanted. Pelotas^talk 21:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Total goalscorers[edit]

Should we add a short table with the top 10 total goalscorers? If anyone wants to make this, this is the list: Kouemaha 16, Lukaku 15, Benteke 14, Boussoufa 14, Foley 14, Sidibe 13, Chevalier 12, Janczyk 12, Thereau 12, Coulibaly 11, Gorius 11, Haroun 11, Suarez 11. Or do we just mention that Kouemaha 'wins' at the introductory text of the goalscorer section? Or nothing at all?--GraafGeorge (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Structural changes[edit]

What did the Belgian media think about the changes? Mobile mundo (talk) 23:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- or –[edit]

Below are examples of both being used.

Biggest away win Mouscron 0–5 Lokeren (12 December 2009) Germinal Beerschot 0-5 Anderlecht (29 January 2010) Highest scoring Lokeren 5–3 Cercle (31 March 2010) AA Gent 6-2 Club Brugge (8 May 2010)

Which one is correct? Mobile mundo (talk) 23:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]