Talk:2010 Canadian Grand Prix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Diagram[edit]

I noticed that the diagram (map of the circuit) seems to be now obsolete, since e.g. actual Turn 5 (according to FIA diagram) is called Turn 7 in the picture used in most Canadian GP articles. The Circuit Gilles Villeneuve contains a more accurate version of the map. I won't edit anything now because I'd like to hear some feedback before editing most Canadian GP articles. Carloseduardo (talk) 02:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The track has been reconfigured several times. All the articles should use an era map, none of them should use a dateless file for the diagram. 70.29.212.131 (talk) 05:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It should also be noted that different sources will disagree over what constitutes a corner. --Falcadore (talk) 08:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thanks it's looking pretty nice now. The turn numbers correlate perfectly (as of 2010) with FIA and BBC. Carloseduardo (talk) 02:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The "unspecified but serious problem" that Vettel was nursing was some form of leak in the gearbox. I can't recall exact details but if someone wants to watch the F1 Forum on the BBC iPlayer, Red Bull boss Christian Horner mentioned it when he was interviewed.217.45.238.49 (talk) 15:34, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrari's 800th race?[edit]

Is there a RELIABLE reference (not just what was published in the press, and not even what the Ferrari team had believed in) that would show beyond doubt that Turkish GP was Ferrari's 800th race? There was significant amount of disagreeing among F1 historians around the announcement that the race in Turkey was Ferrari's 800th. There are counter-claims that the 2010 Canadian GP was the one instead.cherkash (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion continued at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Formula_One#Ferrari's_800th_Grand_Prix. DH85868993 (talk) 14:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]