Talk:2010 FIFA World Cup/Archive 7

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

A small issue

I just noticed that the goal difference for South Africa is shown as +3 instead of -2. I'd fix it myself, but I'm not exactly sure how those templates work - when i try to edit group A's template, I am linked to editing 2014 WC group A's template, for group B i don't have permission granted - it's a really small error, i know, but can someone fix this quick?

Done S.A. Julio (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Wrong table for group C

The goal difference for England should be 2-1 and not 2-2. Please correct this

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2010 FIFA World Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Venue usage...

Given that S. Africa invested a pretty penny in all the necessary venue infrastructure, it deserves to be said in this forum how many matches were played at each stadium. To curtail that info is like not giving credit to where credit is due or being information gatekeepers. Site administrators need to allow more latitude on subject information. After all Wikipedia is supposed to act as a comprehensive source of verified information, not a censorship panel. CharlieCares (talk) 10:26, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

If you want to add info about how many matches were played at each stadium, that's fine, but you're mistaken if you think Wikipedia is supposed to include any information as long as it's sourced. We don't just put info in indiscriminately, we have to show some level of editorial judgement. – Pee Jay 19:25, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

  I take it the main issues are; more measured info latitude is allowed but to avoid overkill and redundancies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlieCares (talk • contribs) 21:00, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2020

This edit request to 2010 FIFA World Cup has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Ntoa ea Lefatše ea FIFA ea 2010 (Southern Sotho) Tshepout (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2020 (UTC) Mohope oa Lefatše ea FIFA ea 2010 (Southern Sotho)

"Ntoa ea Lefatše" means World War however in saying 'Mohope oa Lefatše' that translates to World Cup. Tshepout (talk) 20:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

@Tshepout: Can you provide a link to a reliable source that shows the usage? —C.Fred (talk) 20:20, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

https://st.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohope_oa_Intercontinental Tshepout (talk) 22:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

In this case, the usage is the Intercontinental Cup. Tshepout (talk) 22:27, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Tshepout, Thank for providing the link. I had a link at that other language Wikipedia; unfortunately, I didn't see any external sources, reliable and independent or otherwise. Please note that using other language Wikipedia articles as sources isn't acceptable. As C.Fred noted above, we can only accept reliable sources to substantiate factual information. Dmehus (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Inline link RfC

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

It's clear that this is the same question that is being asked at Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup#Inline link RfC, so I'm closing this per WP:MULTI and WP:FORUMSHOP. I may close the first one too: I'm still undecided on that matter. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:36, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Should the name of the host nation include an inline link to the nation's article? For example, should the first instance of the name "South Africa" be bracketed so as to provide a link to South Africa? Rowsdower45 (talk) 06:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Oppose First this is a clear WP:OVERLINK, it is against a WP:FOOTY WP:CONSENSUS, and exactly the same question as you asked at Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup and you are WP:FORUMSHOPping hoping you'll get your way in one location. Stop it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:18, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose This is already linked in the lede. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 08:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Oppose per my comment at Talk:2002_FIFA_World_Cup#Inline_link_RfC. Tony (talk) 08:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Support It would be helpful as a clarifying measure to establish that this refers to the Republic of South Africa, rather than merely denoting the southern portion of Africa. Rowsdower45 (talk) 11:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.