This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jacksonville, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.JacksonvilleWikipedia:WikiProject JacksonvilleTemplate:WikiProject JacksonvilleJacksonville articles
These teal "dividers" are absolutely stupid, because they appear to section the article into weeks, but instead, divide each week in half. They are so loud (yet, admittedly, attractive) that they dominate the summary section and give a false impression of when each week's summary begins and ends. Gotta go. 98.82.23.53 (talk) 21:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I checked. Nobody else appears to have anything else like that (though the Colts have something remotely similar but not at all confusing. So it's gone. Don't put back the teal bars without justifying yourself here. 98.82.23.53 (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I adapted them from the dividers used in the Dallas Cowboys article. Admittedly they are easier on the eyes when using the Dallas Blue/Grey color scheme. I'm all for getting a unified look across the articles, so either remove them there or restore them here. For the time being I restored them to the grey color they used to have. Also, they're not just dividers, they contain scoring and statistics information. DragonFury (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS. I really like the way the summaries look in the Colts article. Those manage to keep the attractiveness of the team colors while not separating the infobox from the summary. DragonFury (talk) 21:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I totally missed the fact that they were expandable. The light Dallas color is better, but it still looks like it's dividing one part of the week from the other, making the top of one week look like it belongs to the previous week.
Uniformity is desirable, but no one can impose upon the entire project their vision. What we need to do first is establish the look we like here at Jaguars, then gently test the waters in the other season articles. As much as I hate Peyton and Polian, I have to admit the Colts fans who did up their look got it right. Why don't you copy that, with Jaguar colors? 98.82.23.53 (talk) 22:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Quick feedback required, Which is better? DragonFury (talk) 23:01, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Option 1:
Week 4: Indianapolis Colts at Jacksonville Jaguars – Game summary
I like option 1. I definitely like the collapsable option, though. It looks a lot more cluttered now. I think Template:Americanfootballbox has an option for colors. ~ Richmond96 t • c 23:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here's what I like: ~ Richmond96 t • c 23:17, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
