Talk:2010 United States Senate election in Florida

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested edit[edit]

Got an email today via OTRS: please be advised that you left out the candidate Rev. Dr. Gwyndolyn McClellan, educator/consultant, publisher and evangelist as a candidate for the United States Senate seat to be vacated by Senator Mel Martinez.

I have limited knowledge of the subject matter, so just dropping a note here hoping someone more knowledgeable will know what to do :) Daniel (talk) 21:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

democratic primary[edit]

I do not believe that the democratic primary has been held yet, shouldn't the democratic nominee be "to be determined" instead of kendrick meeks? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.85.50.66 (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why were Jeff Greene deleted from historical polls? His results in polls are notable for history of this campaign. --Dezidor (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No one with a majority?[edit]

What happens if the top vote getter gets less than 50% of the votes? This looks quite possible at this point, so it is a serious question. Does the top vote getter win even if they only have 35-49% of the votes? Is there a run-off election among the top 2? Inquiring minds want to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.105.72.67 (talk) 19:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Florida has no run-offs; a candidate with 33.4% could beat two others with 33.3% each. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:31, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on United States Senate election in Florida, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on United States Senate election in Florida, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on United States Senate election in Florida, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]