Talk:2011–12 MSV Duisburg season

Football: Germany / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the German football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted because i am working on it right now! Kante4 (talk) 23:59, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted because... Well, really, because the tag is patent nonsense. The article may need a bit of clarification, but speedy deletion is way too far. Sellyme^Talk 00:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you guys may be right, it does need a lot of work, but as it is now, we cant even make out a complete sentence from it. kante, if you intended it to point to german football, you should just mention it instead of having the user have to go to a link to find out. i dont live in germany; i live in the u.s. and football may or may not be different in your country compared to ours, and no, im not trying to be clever.Thebestofall007 (talk) 00:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WTF? Read the article, and again i am working on it, especially tomorrow. It is not different than any other Season article from a football club. Kante4 (talk) 00:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i did, over and over again and it still doesnt flow well to the reader. i look up the references listed and they are all in german. Thebestofall007 (talk) 00:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep because it´s a german club and no english sites covers this club most of the time. That´s why the headline is written in english next to it. And for the third time, more infos tomorrow in the article. Maybe you need some more time here at wikipedia to look at different things because it sure looks like you don´t get along good so far with the guidelines. For example give a editor a day or two to make his article better instead of directly tagging it. Kante4 (talk) 00:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i removed the template to let you have a chance to improve the article. sorry about that.Thebestofall007 (talk) 00:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More info comes when the season starts like starting lineup, statistics and so on... I get a feeling that you are a bit cocky from talking with you, just a feeling. Kante4 (talk) 01:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no, i was getting a lot of articles coming in on the new page patrol, one right after the other, that are/were outright vandalism (self promotion and non-notables) and i had to tag them. if your article was in the crossfire, please accept my apology. and yes, although i have been editing on wikipedia for about 3 years, i am new at tagging.Thebestofall007 (talk) 02:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2011–12 MSV Duisburg season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]