Talk:2011 Cricket World Cup/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bill william compton (talk · contribs) 15:53, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Article is lacking inline citations for many facts, including several entire paragraphs and sections. There is still too much work to do. I'm failing this article.

Few points for the betterment

• Use properly formatted inline citation for each and every fact.
• The prose still needs quite a bit of work, including through copy editing.
• Expand sections like "Format", "Opening ceremony", "Venues", "Squads", etc. Add a section for the closing ceremony.

— Bill william compton^Talk 16:08, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Can you kindly explain? Then I'll see what I can do. Dipankan ^{(Have a chat?)} 16:06, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

This article still needs a lot of work. Please reevaluate WP:WIAGA before renominating. I'd love to see a cricket world cup article as a GA. — Bill william compton^Talk 16:10, 3 May 2012 (UTC)