Talk:2011 Musselshell River flood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who got it worse?[edit]

For the moment, I'm moving a disputed bit over here: " Flooding was less severe in counties that are not part of the Musselshell watershed.[1][2] " I question this because the two articles cited do not say this explicitly, and the MSNBC piece is so poorly written that they don't even explain that the flooding they described occurred over multiple river basins (the confusion over Crow Agency in an earlier edit is attributable to the MSNBC article, I think) . I am guessing that Roundup may have more monetary damage of any one county because of population and infrastructure damage, but the flooding on the Yellowstone and its tributaries was also very severe and covered a much wider geographic area. Folks on the Crow Rez down by Crow Agency probably were more severely affected than those in Roundup, but a sparser population and poorer region probably means the economic numbers won't be as high -- I'm not arguing that things weren't bad in Roundup, I just don't want to put in too categorical a statement without a source that says so. (smile) Montanabw(talk) 21:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. But one source did say Roundup had it worse. BarkingMoon (talk) 21:21, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's also a problem, dueling sources. I read the MSNBC piece to say that the Musselshell flooding was the "worst" - there in Roundup - since 1967. CBS source says 'Crow Reservation, one of the hardest hit areas" Missoulian article has someone saying they Yellowstone is "the highest water anybody here has ever seen." I'll grant Roundup had the deepest water, their big road washout might have stranded the most people for a while, and probably the most monetary damage once they crunch it all, but I want to see more data. Had Crow Agency been the size of Roundup with a few more paved roads nearby, I'd bet there'd be a run for the money damages too. Montanabw(talk) 21:41, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011 Musselshell River flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference bg1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference msnbc was invoked but never defined (see the help page).