Talk:2011 Subway Fresh Fit 500

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2011 Subway Fresh Fit 500 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 20, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2011 Subway Fresh Fit 500/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 12:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC) Hi,[reply]

I will start this review shortly. Looks good! MathewTownsend (talk) 12:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Just a few questions about the prose.

  • Race
  • "Three laps later, Newman overtook the lead after passing Newman," - must be a typo
  • "and Kenseth became the leader. After the green flag pit stops concluded, Johnson continued to be the leader," - is something left out here?
    • Are you thinking of the pit stops are left out? -- Nascar1996(TalkContribs) 02:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • But when did Johnson become the leader, if after the pit stops concluded, Johnson continued to be the leader? What am I missing. MathewTownsend (talk) 02:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • He was the leader, then while making his pit stop he lost the lead to Kenseth, then when everyone else pitted he got the lead back. -- Nascar1996(TalkContribs) 03:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-race
  • Although Kyle Busch was leading the race near the end, Gordon passed him with nine laps left - why is this in the "Post-race" as it sounds like it happened during the race?
    • I placed this here because it gives the reader some knowledge of how the race finished without reading the race summary section. -- Nascar1996(TalkContribs) 02:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Everything else looks good. I did a little copy editing and disambiged a couple of links.[1] Please feel free to change any mistakes.

MathewTownsend (talk) 01:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 13:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2011 Subway Fresh Fit 500. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]