Talk:2011 Vasylkiv terror plot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The protest of 10 Jan. 2014 and Euromaidan[edit]

Regarding this edit (and to prevent an edit war ): I think the 10 Jan. 2014 clashes (caused by the verdict in this alleged 2011 Lenin statue bomb plot) have nothing to do with Euromaidan... And I think it is just a coincidence that people also involved in Euromaidan got caught up in the 10 Jan. 2014 clashes (a.k.a. by accident). Hence I think Category:Political scandals in Ukraine; −Category:Riots and civil disorder in Ukraine; −Category:Protests in Ukraine should be reinstated in this article. (And Category:Euromaidan should stay because this Wiki-article and Euromaidan are loosely linked). — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • This article is not about protests or riots or scandals. This is about 2011 plot in general. Also Category:Euromaidan already included in this categories. That's why I think, per WP:SUBCAT this is an unneeded categorization. NickSt (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

Agree. Also, seeing as they were convicted, they can no longer be 'alleged' by definition. Whether the allegations were proven true in a show trial is a whole 'nother matter but that POV shouldn't be prominent in the title - keep it neutral --Львівське (говорити) 18:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Yulia, what do you say about title? NickSt (talk) 19:33, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
+ 1 source... OK; I agree Vasylkiv terrorists case seems to be the most used in English to describe the events. At the time I wrote the article I could find this not... So I decided to take Alleged 2007 bomb plot in Copenhagen as an example-tittle.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yulia Romero (talkcontribs)

Conviction[edit]

The article goes directly from allegations to the sentencing and protests. It needs to explicitly say that the accused were found guilty. Kablammo (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]