Talk:2011 West Virginia gubernatorial special election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Major candidates[edit]

In West Virginia, the Democratic, Republican, and Mountain parties have guaranteed ballot access on the basis of their performance in past elections. It seems that listing their candidates is an objective way of who is determining who is a "major" candidate.

To the best of my knowledge, there have been no surveys conducted after the Democratic and Republican parties held their primaries. Excluding Baber from the list of candidates when all of the polling is pre-primary, Baber was never polled, and there is a large undecided block seems inappropriate. Bitmapped (talk) 01:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't the fact that nobody considers them when conducting a poll indicate that they are an insignificant party that is unlikely to sway the results? Mountain Party candidates have never gained 5% or more of the vote in any statewide election to date. Rxguy (talk) 01:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If there was a post-primary poll that excluded the Mountain Party candidate, perhaps. But there has not been. Bitmapped (talk) 01:38, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, until there is proof that he could play a significant role in the election it is probably best to leave him omitted from the election box as his party has not yet proven itself to be a major party when it comes to statewide elections. Let's face it, it's a liberal group in a state that is more socially conservative and votes for moderate Democrats. Rxguy (talk) 03:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maloney headshot blue resized.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Maloney headshot blue resized.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:21, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Declined[edit]

That's the way it's always been done? So what?! These people have absolutely no connection to the election. They just happen to be West Virginia politicians, and guess what? They didn't run for governor. Is the reader too stupid to assume that anyone not listed as running simply isn't running? Brooks McCabe said he would run but later changed his mind, so he could be mentioned, but it is completely meaningless to include the Republicans who declined. There are dozens of WV politicians who could have run, and every one of them declined except those who didn't. So why list those who happen to have publicly said No, or said nothing and never got in the race. They are simply irrelevant and should not be included in the article. Reywas92Talk 03:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on West Virginia gubernatorial special election, 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]