Talk:2012 Papua New Guinea Defence Force mutiny

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2012 Papua New Guinea Defence Force mutiny article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Melanesia: Papua New Guinea Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Papua New Guinea (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: South Pacific / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Comment[edit]

This is part of a larger Papua New Guinea constitutional crisis - please address that and sorry for a fork--Reader1987 (talk) 09:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Army rebellion deepens Papua New Guinea constitutional crisis --Reader1987 (talk) 09:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Nick-D (talk) 10:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Consider a merger, too--Reader1987 (talk) 10:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that they're sufficiently separate to be handled in different articles, particularly as the crisis is almost entirely political in nature. Nick-D (talk) 10:51, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I'm inclined to agree with Nick here. Additionally, I'd contend that this article contains sufficient detail that it should be a separate article. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 13:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]