Talk:2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic star2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10 is part of the 2012 Tour de France series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 25, 2015Good article nomineeListed
November 18, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Profiles[edit]

Why aren't we using the official ASO profiles? --Troyeseffigy (talk) 06:50, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because they are copyrighted. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:58, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this one. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The following needs to be taken care of:

  • Prologue: The first paragraph needs sources, both for the course and the statement of the expected times.
  • Stage 6: were as one again, not long later sounds really weird, maybe you can find a better wording?
  • The references to the Team Sky website are dead, please find a replacement or archived links here.

That's about it. Good job so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 22:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All taken care of, hopefully. Craig(talk) 22:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, it's a pass! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]