This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This word, if it's a legitimate part of the article, needs to be explained (as in "Democrat (Fake)". -Pete (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is legitimate, if you check the previous recall, you can see a description of the details. The particulars may vary, but not the whole. It should certainly not be removed. 209.144.63.76 (talk) 17:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can certainly imagine that there's good reason to describe it this way, but it's the sort of thing that really needs to be sourced to a high-quality citation. -Pete (talk) 16:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
