Talk:2013 U.S. Open Cup

Football: American & Canadian / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Tuscon gets Amateur prize?[edit]

Is there anyt data backing this up? From the bracket it looks like several other amateur clubs reached the thrid round, and none going beyond the third round including

PDL Ocean City Nor'easters

Des Moines Menace
	PDL 	 Reading United

If there was some tie breaker that Tuscon won to get the prize we should site it and mention it in the article, without that data, I have no reason to believe that the above 4 clubs didn't split the prize, making for a whopping $3,750 each

Largest-ever field, increased prize money highlight 2013 US Open Cup[edit]

http://www.mlssoccer.com/news/article/2013/03/05/largest-ever-field-increased-prize-money-highlight-2013-us-open-cup Anttipng (talk) 22:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Order for Bracket[edit]

Traditionally, there has been some relationship between home/visiting team and the order in the bracket. I don't think this makes sense - especially with the 36 teams in Round 1, which means winners of 4 games will play each other rather than a team just entering the tournament.

In order to make the bracket easier to read - I think the winning team should take the same slot (top or bottom) as they had in the prior round - that way it is easier to see whether a team came from the prior round or not. Any thoughts?? --Trödel 18:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, traditionally all brackets show the home team on top. I don't think it needs to be switched as all the teams line up directly next to the game they came from. The exceptions at the bottom of the bracket obviously show the line connecting the two games that fed the teams playing in Rd 2. So my opinion is that it is easy to read as is. Chris1834 (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2013 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2013 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]