Jump to content

Talk:2015 NBL Canada Finals brawl/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Taking this as requested. Should do this within 24 hours hopefully... JAGUAR  22:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "According to Rainmen player Forrest Fisher, Jones tackled McMorrow to the ground and Express guard Tony Bennett followed up by hitting the center with a chair" - who is the center?
    "NBL Canada executive committee Vito Frijia, who had the bus stop in the middle of the highway" - who had the bus top? Does this mean to say that he was in the bus stop?
    "In the morning of May 2, two days after the brawl" - On the morning
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

There were a couple of things I found confusing but overall I enjoyed reading it. It is well written, comprehensive and meets the criteria, so I'll pass this outright. JAGUAR  11:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: I have addressed the issues you pointed out, thanks for the review. TempleM (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]