A fact from 2015 Ratlam by-election appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 October 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
I am copyeditng this thing and in doing so I have just mistakenly said that sources do not give the day of the count. In fact, the Pioneer source does say that the count would take place on 24 November but the story was published on 18 November and things can change. I'm not reverting myself because, really, it is trivial padding to the article. - Sitush (talk) 08:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem I have used The Pioneer citation for adding the same. Many thanks for the copyedit. --Skr15081997 (talk) 08:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Still working on it. Election articles of this type have a very obvious structure to them: (1) cause, place, (2) campaign, (3) outcome. This one was jumbled up. - Sitush (talk) 08:38, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What is the difference between cultural nationalism (a phrase we use in the article) and Hindutva, which is what the BJP are usually described as favouring. They sound like the same thing to me and I think we might have to explain both that phrase and the opposition's "religious polarisation". Imagine you are reading the article and are not familiar with India: the terms are vague and need some sort of context. - Sitush (talk) 08:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
