Talk:2016 United Nations Secretary-General selection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United Nations Secretary-General selection, 2016. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge both articles and keep United Nations Secretary-General selection, 2016. Wykx (talk) 12:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that United Nations Secretary-General election, 2016 be merged into United Nations Secretary-General selection, 2016. I think that the content in the election article can easily be explained in the context of selection, and the selection article is of a reasonable size that the merging of election will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. And this one is more accurate and complete. --Wildcursive (talk) 23:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strongly support: the "election" article is thinner and only duplication. Wikiain (talk) 23:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Makes sense. The Drover's Wife (talk) 04:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merging. -Mardus /talk 13:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support No need for a duplicate page. --Killuminator (talk) 22:08, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support No need for a duplicate page. -- IndexAccount (talk) 07:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strongly support, since the two articles are effectively duplicates.--TommyBoy (talk) 01:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strongly support I suggest to eliminate the election article as everything in it is already included in the selection article -- ivoluissantos (talk) 11:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
comment merging is fine as this was bigger, but the title is more consistent with "election." He is after ll elected (even non popular elections are call so)Lihaas (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please merge the histories of the two articles.Lihaas (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(not an admin) Merger complete. Histmerge not needed. Rotideypoc41352 (talk) 19:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christiana Figueres[edit]

This media outlet suggests that Christiana Figueres withdrew her candidacy. It's in Spanish and Google Translate isn't the most reliable tool. Can a Spanish speaking user confirm it ? This is the article. --Killuminator (talk) 22:16, 31 August 2016 (UTC) The polls in the article seem to indicate this I done.Lihaas (talk) 12:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

not the 9th to succeed[edit]

Guterres is not "the ninth Secretary-General of the United Nations to succeed Ban Ki-moon". He was elected to succeed Ban Ki-moon as the ninth SG of the UN". --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 16:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Srgjan Kerim candidacy[edit]

At the time of this selection, North Macedonia was "FYROM" or "FYR Macedonia" within the UN. This was also how the candidacy was presented:

https://www.un.org/pga/70/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2015/08/SGs-Candidacy-Dr.-Kerim-FYRM.pdf

Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]