Talk:2016 United States presidential election in South Carolina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of United States presidential election in South Carolina, 2016's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "realclearpolitics.com":

  • From Republican Party presidential debates, 2016: "RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination". Real Clear Politics.
  • From Ben Carson presidential campaign, 2016: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/2016_presidential_race.html Real Clear Politics
  • From Democratic Party presidential debates, 2016: "2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination".
  • From Mike Huckabee presidential campaign, 2016: Scott Conroy (October 23, 2014) In Iowa, Mike Huckabee Is Making Moves RealClearPolitics.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 19:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who will win on Feb.20th and what will it mean?[edit]

Stuart Rothenberg has a good article in Roll Call. He sees a three-man race in the making.[1]

References

-- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 14:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]