This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles
Is it necessary to have that huge chart of the protected list in here? Doesn't appear to be the norm for past expansion draft articles, and maybe a citation that links to a published article is sufficient? Ultimately I would think that list of who IS drafted, and not who can't be, would be most important after results are announced. Echoedmyron (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I kind of agree. Frankly, it should be unprotected players that are shown because they are eligible. LordAtlas (talk) 00:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, the results of the expansion draft should be the focal point of this article, not the protection lists for the other NHL teams. Ho-ju-96 (talk) 07:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1991 NHL Dispersal and Expansion Drafts which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]