Talk:2017 Portland train attack/Archive 1

Archive 1

Good article?

I suppose we should give this article more time to settle, but I think it's coming along nicely and may be close to meeting GA criteria. Do any editors agree, disagree, or have any interest in trying to promote this article to Good status? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

@Another Believer: I think that'd be cool. Kamalthebest (talk) 16:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

@Neutrality, Kamalthebest, WWGB, and Grand'mere Eugene: We're the top 5 editors of this article, according to the revision statistic. Do one or more of you have any interest in nominating this article for Good status, or participating in a co-nomination? I actually feel like I'm less familiar with this article's content, but I'd love to see the article promoted if editors feel it meets criteria. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 02:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

@Another Believer: I'm not exactly sure what the procedure is for nominating an article for "good status" but I think it earns that title. Kamalthebest (talk) 21:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

@Kamalthebest: Just in case you are interested, there are instructions at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

@Another Believer: Ah, thanks! I will look into this. Kamalthebest (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

I have submitted it for nomination but I don't think it fits a category such as "politics" so I have left that blank for now. Anyone can change this if they like. Kamalthebest (talk) 00:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Expansion

@Bri, Grand'mere Eugene, and Kamalthebest: Thank you, all, for helping to expand this article. If any of you know there are some content gaps needing to be addressed, feel free to share here. Nice to see this article building so quickly and neatly, despite the sad subject matter. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

• re: Hillary Clinton ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
  • @Another Believer: I have added it. Trump's response should also added, if he has given one. Kamalthebest (talk) 22:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
    • @Kamalthebest: Re: Trump:
• http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/29/politics/donald-trump-portland-attack/
• http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2017/05/donald_trump_portland_max_atta.html
• https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/29/portland-attack-donald-trump-called-on-to-make-statement-about-double

---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

• http://www.opb.org/news/article/portland-free-speech-march-sharia-wheeler-permit/ ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)  Done

Draft article for memorial

Too soon to create in the main space, but editors are welcome to assist with a draft article about the planned memorial at Draft:2017 Portland train attack memorial. 20:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

This may be of help: [1] C. W. Gilmore (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I added this link to the draft article's talk page. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Here is the Oregonian's take on the artist selection: [2] Hope this helps. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 00:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

We Choose Love

FYI, I moved Portland train attack memorial to We Choose Love. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:44, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Ref error

Resolved

How can we track down the ref to remove the "Cite error: The named reference OPBToAppear was invoked but never defined" warning? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

• I think the ref bot will come and fix it. Neutrality^talk 22:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

  Neutrality, Indeed! Thanks, ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:47, 24 February 2020 (UTC)