Talk:2017 vote of no confidence in the government of Mariano Rajoy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AnonymousPurpose (talk · contribs)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

With respect to the good article criteria, I believe this article has an amazing handling on all of it's requirements.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Awesome work on the structure and grammar, it helps hold the whole article together!

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Great reference section, very well versed from all aspects of the situation. Along with the information being reliable it is also verifiable quite easily.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The editors of this article did a great job elaborating on all topics to have the best interest possible.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   I deeply appreciate the attention to detail to include politics in this but not let it effect the argument and where the article stands.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   From what I've seen, almost all of the work done was completely organized and efficient.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All of the images and media used is properly captioned and looks to be sourced properly.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Amazing work! So happy to see such a quality article on Wikipedia that fairly covers everything.

07:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)